There are times, such as the past two weeks, when a British prime minister should have been thinking less about private influence and more about public advocacy. Could the Prime Minister really not speak up for the simple proposition that the slaughter of innocent people in Lebanon, the destruction of their country and the ruin of half a million lives were wrong and should stop immediately? "What kind of ceasefire?" Blair asks. One that stopped the horror, even for 24 hours, would be a start.
Thursday, July 27, 2006
Sir Stephen Wall, a former top foreign policy adviser to Tony Blair, writing in the New Statesman:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(23)
-
▼
July
(12)
- Now for the big question, is Hezbollah a "terroris...
- The NYT can at times be comical. In an article ent...
- Bush/Blair/Olmert are helping to unify the Middle ...
- The war on Lebanon continues (bbc):More than 54 ci...
- As usual, Rami G. Khouri makes interesting points ...
- How can Thomas Friedman be regarded as an expert o...
- From the daily starHizbullah has already agreed to...
- Sir Stephen Wall, a former top foreign policy advi...
- Fisk has been writing about Lebanon. Interesting l...
- Lebanese Prime Minister Signora says:"what future ...
- In the washington post we get thisThe Rice delegat...
- On Sunday Dianne Feinstein chose to attend a "Isra...
-
▼
July
(12)
No comments:
Post a Comment